Structural Learning

Learning Barrier Analyser

Notice the barrier. Keep the learning goal. Add one scaffold. Review the impact.

Private by design: no names, diagnoses, free text, accounts, analytics, storage or network requests.

Describe the task, not the learner

The observable signal selects a predefined scaffold. The other choices record context and a review point. The result is a hypothesis, not an assessment of need.

1Where did the learning barrier appear?
2What did you see or hear?

Pick one primary signal. Avoid inferred causes such as laziness, low ability or motivation.

3What must stay challenging?
4When will you look again?

Do not wait for this process before taking safeguarding action, providing accessibility measures or following support required by an existing plan.

Use the result as a test

Re-observe the same task demand and ask for the learner's perspective. Keep or adapt support as needed. Successful participation with an adjustment is not evidence that it should be withdrawn.

This original Structural Learning tool is informed by CAST UDL Guidelines 3.0, the EEF Guide to Inclusive Teaching (2026), EEF SEND guidance, UNESCO inclusion guidance and the SEND Code of Practice for England. It does not reproduce or replace those frameworks. Universal provision does not replace targeted or statutory support.

Terminology varies: SEND and SENCO are used in England. South Africa uses SIAS, the United States often uses UDL and disability-law terminology, and Australia commonly frames reasonable adjustments through its own national standards. Apply current local duties and language.