# Evaluation Scenarios

Test scenarios for the Assessment Value and Business Case Builder skill (lean two-stream model,
compact branded Word document). Each scenario has a prompt and a checklist a reviewer can score
Pass / Partial / Fail.

## How to use

1. Open a fresh conversation with this skill installed.
2. Paste the prompt.
3. Compare the skill's behavior and the rendered document against the checklist.

## Scoring dimensions (0 = fail, 1 = partial, 2 = pass)

- Intake discipline: gathers the inputs for the mode before building; never invents numbers.
- Gain, not level: models both the current process and the proposed battery; value is based on
  the difference (added validity), not the absolute level of either.
- Budget captured: asks the annual investment and uses it as the value-per-dollar denominator.
- Validity handling: looks up Sackett (2022) values; combines via multiple-R (0.2 intercorr.,
  0.60 cap) for both batteries; never a naive sum.
- Two streams: performance always; retention only if a turnover rate was supplied; the two are
  presented as additive, with retention secondary.
- No NPV: figures are undiscounted; the methodology says so.
- Scenarios: impact shows Conservative / Expected / Strong, never a point estimate.
- No coefficients in body: r / R / rho appear only in the methodology section; the body uses
  plain language and dollars.
- Compactness: cover plus three content pages (four max); methodology is one page; no orphaned
  headings; no blank pages.
- Call to action: the fixed "About Deeper Signals" section is present and identical to the
  approved variant.
- Disclaimer: the standard disclaimer appears verbatim as the final block.
- USD throughout; no em or en dashes anywhere; never scores or ranks a candidate.

A passing skill scores >= 18/22 with no zeros on "no coefficients in body", "two streams",
"never scores a candidate", or "disclaimer verbatim".
