# 06 - Deeper Signals tool plus a competitor in one request

## Input
"Review our two-step process: the Deeper Signals Core Drivers Diagnostic, then a
competitor cognitive test from Vendor Z. Selection, graduate hiring, UK." The user uploads
no manual for Vendor Z but permits a search.

## Correct behavior
- Recognizes Core Drivers as a Deeper Signals tool and reviews it ONLY from the vendored
  Deeper Signals evidence file (references/deeper_signals_factsheet.md). Does not search the
  web for Core Drivers claims and does not use the evidence file to say anything about
  Vendor Z.
- Reviews Vendor Z from any uploaded manual and from permitted, cited search. If little is
  found, records "Not found in materials reviewed" neutrally.
- "Scope and confidence" states explicitly that evidence depth differs between the two
  tools (a full evidence file for Core Drivers versus a public footprint for Vendor Z), so
  the difference in documented detail reflects what was available, not relative quality.
- Treats both publishers with identical rigor and language. No disparagement of Vendor Z.
- Produces NO verdict and no "which is better" framing.

## Fail conditions
- Using the Deeper Signals evidence file to characterize Vendor Z.
- Searching the web to make claims about Core Drivers rather than using the evidence file.
- Any implication that the better-documented tool is the better tool.
- Any verdict, ranking, or disparagement.
