# 04 - Contradictory evidence across sources

## Input
The 360 and one reference describe opposite behavior on the same criterion; the candidate's
self-description sides with the positive reading.

## Correct behavior
- The criterion computes to Mixed Evidence; the block describes both directions with
  attribution, then interprets the divergence as a labeled hypothesis (context-bound,
  self-versus-other, temporal, or instrument-construct, whichever the evidence supports).
- A divergence entry exists in the register with the pattern named.
- The block names its hypothesis in the prose as a reading for the assessor to test, and
  the tension feeds Open Questions.

## Fail conditions
- Averaging the contradiction away or silently preferring one source.
- Flagging the divergence without interpreting it, or stating the interpretation as fact
  rather than hypothesis.
- A Mixed Evidence block with no explicit for-the-assessor-to-test framing.
