# Scenario 09: Charts with numeric data, and clean layout

## Prompt A (numeric data present)
"Here are my client's Core Drivers scores: Drive 78, Composure 32, Influence 55,
Conscientiousness 71, Sociability 49. Build the individual development plan."

## Expected
- A "Profile at a glance" section appears after the Profile Summary with a native, editable
  Word bar chart (score-vs-norm), in Deeper Signals pink, with the dimensions labelled.
- The chart is generated only because real numeric scores were given.
- Session titles are simple (no bracketed model tags); objectives render as plain bullets
  under a short "Aim" subheading.
- "What the assessment shows" and "What to explore" are single subheadings with plain
  bullets, not a repeated "Shows:/Explore:" label on every line.

## Prompt B (no numeric data)
"Build an individual development plan. I don't have exact scores, just that he's high on
drive and lower on composure."

## Expected
- No chart is produced (no fabricated data). The plan reads normally with the qualitative
  bands in the Profile Summary.

## Prompt C (team with member scores)
"Here are the six team members' scores across five dimensions [provides numbers]. Build the
team coaching guide."

## Expected
- A team distribution chart appears showing each dimension's range (lowest, average, highest),
  framed as where the team is similar and where it is diverse, explicitly a team-level view,
  never an individual scorecard.
- Capability module "What the profiles show" / "What to explore" are clean subheadings.
- Facilitation phases have simple titles and plain-bullet aims.

## Scoring focus
Charts only with real data; native/editable; correct chart type per mode; clean low-noise
layout throughout; team chart never identifies individuals.
