Introduction

The results of the analysis are presented using the following structure:

  1. Searchable High‑Level Summary: Provides a brief overview of the key findings from our analysis with a table of effects
  2. Visualisation, Descriptive Statistics and Diagnostics by Variable: Exploratory data analysis and model diagnostics for each behavioral measure
  3. Searchable ROPE Analysis Table: Model diagnostics to check the fit of the models

Effects of Interest

  • CRA has lower basal serum testosterone than Control

Searchable High‑Level Summary

Enter search terms in the column headers to filter the table below

Note: TD in the Higher column indicates a Trend Difference for the continuous variable.

Visualisation, Descriptive Statistics and Diagnostics by Variable

Bar Plot

Density Plot

Serum Testosterone by Grouping Variables
Diet n Mean SD Min Max % of Zeros Zero Flag
Control 14.0 348.1 140.8 155.8 724.8 0.0
CR25 14.0 313.3 133.1 116.4 538.4 0.0
CRA 14.0 236.7 70.8 114.2 339.2 0.0
CRV 14.0 280.2 106.2 165.7 538.4 0.0
Warning symbols: * = >40% zeros in this group, ! = >20% zeros in entire sample Either flag triggers the use of a binary choice model.

Summary Table

Model Summary
Family: gamma
Parameter Estimate Std. Error 2.5% CI 97.5% CI Type
Fixed Effects
Intercept 5.848 0.097 5.658 6.041 Fixed Effects
DietCR25 −0.097 0.137 −0.365 0.170 Fixed Effects
DietCRA −0.373 0.138 −0.641 −0.102 Fixed Effects
DietCRV −0.207 0.138 −0.474 0.072 Fixed Effects

Posterior Check

Convergence

Effect Median [95% HDI] Direction Prob. ROPE %
Diet: Control vs CR25
Diet: Control vs CR25 0.10 [-0.14, 0.39] 76.70 15.85
Diet: Control vs CRA
Diet: Control vs CRA 0.38 [0.12, 0.64] 99.45 0.65
Diet: Control vs CRV
Diet: Control vs CRV 0.21 [-0.06, 0.47] 92.95 6.00
Diet: CR25 vs CRA
Diet: CR25 vs CRA 0.27 [-0.02, 0.54] 97.35 2.65
Diet: CR25 vs CRV
Diet: CR25 vs CRV 0.10 [-0.16, 0.40] 78.00 14.40
Diet: CRA vs CRV
Diet: CRA vs CRV -0.16 [-0.43, 0.12] 88.30 9.75

No continuous ROPE effects available.

End of Document