Introduction

The results of the analysis are presented using the following structure:

  1. Searchable High‑Level Summary: Provides a brief overview of the key findings from our analysis with a table of effects
  2. Visualisation, Descriptive Statistics and Diagnostics by Variable: Exploratory data analysis and model diagnostics for each behavioral measure
  3. Searchable ROPE Analysis Table: Model diagnostics to check the fit of the models

Effects of Interest

  • CRA dams displayed less passive nursing behaviours compared to Control dams.
  • CRV dams displayed higher out of the nest behaviours compared to Control dams.

Searchable High‑Level Summary

Enter search terms in the column headers to filter the table below

Note: TD in the Higher column indicates a Trend Difference for the continuous variable.

Visualisation, Descriptive Statistics and Diagnostics by Variable

Bar Plot

Density Plot

A-Back Nursing by Grouping Variables
Diet n Mean SD Min Max % of Zeros Zero Flag
Control 12.0 39.4 11.3 19.0 57.3 0.0
CR25 11.0 37.9 13.2 23.7 64.7 0.0
CRA 10.0 42.1 11.7 26.0 65.7 0.0
CRV 12.0 38.3 15.0 15.3 66.7 0.0
Warning symbols: * = >40% zeros in this group, ! = >20% zeros in entire sample Either flag triggers the use of a binary choice model.

Summary Table

Model Summary
Family: gaussian
Parameter Estimate Std. Error 2.5% CI 97.5% CI Type
Fixed Effects
Intercept 39.006 1.941 35.213 42.779 Fixed Effects
DietCR25 −0.100 0.968 −2.016 1.786 Fixed Effects
DietCRA 0.164 0.969 −1.744 2.099 Fixed Effects
DietCRV −0.074 0.966 −1.952 1.836 Fixed Effects

Posterior Check

Convergence

Effect Median [95% HDI] Direction Prob. ROPE %
Diet: Control vs CR25
Diet: Control vs CR25 0.06 [-1.73, 2.04] 52.65 80.15
Diet: Control vs CRA
Diet: Control vs CRA -0.15 [-2.24, 1.59] 55.60 79.45
Diet: Control vs CRV
Diet: Control vs CRV 0.05 [-1.90, 1.92] 51.95 79.15
Diet: CR25 vs CRA
Diet: CR25 vs CRA -0.23 [-3.21, 2.18] 57.30 62.35
Diet: CR25 vs CRV
Diet: CR25 vs CRV -0.04 [-2.64, 2.77] 51.05 63.45
Diet: CRA vs CRV
Diet: CRA vs CRV 0.22 [-2.65, 2.91] 56.15 63.15

No continuous ROPE effects available.

Bar Plot

Density Plot

Blanket-Passive Nursing by Grouping Variables
Diet n Mean SD Min Max % of Zeros Zero Flag
Control 12.0 12.2 6.3 3.0 27.3 0.0
CR25 11.0 10.5 3.3 4.0 14.3 0.0
CRA 10.0 7.1 4.1 0.7 14.7 0.0
CRV 12.0 11.6 8.2 2.3 30.3 0.0
Warning symbols: * = >40% zeros in this group, ! = >20% zeros in entire sample Either flag triggers the use of a binary choice model.

Summary Table

Model Summary
Family: gamma
Parameter Estimate Std. Error 2.5% CI 97.5% CI Type
Fixed Effects
Intercept 2.497 0.158 2.199 2.824 Fixed Effects
DietCR25 −0.134 0.231 −0.584 0.316 Fixed Effects
DietCRA −0.503 0.235 −0.960 −0.035 Fixed Effects
DietCRV −0.037 0.226 −0.473 0.417 Fixed Effects

Posterior Check

Convergence

Effect Median [95% HDI] Direction Prob. ROPE %
Diet: Control vs CR25
Diet: Control vs CR25 0.14 [-0.27, 0.58] 73.00 12.70
Diet: Control vs CRA
Diet: Control vs CRA 0.51 [0.10, 1.01] 98.35 1.40
Diet: Control vs CRV
Diet: Control vs CRV 0.05 [-0.41, 0.47] 58.50 16.55
Diet: CR25 vs CRA
Diet: CR25 vs CRA 0.37 [-0.16, 0.83] 93.55 3.65
Diet: CR25 vs CRV
Diet: CR25 vs CRV -0.09 [-0.52, 0.37] 66.10 14.60
Diet: CRA vs CRV
Diet: CRA vs CRV -0.47 [-0.92, 0.03] 96.95 2.50

No continuous ROPE effects available.

Bar Plot

Density Plot

LG/LG+Nursing by Grouping Variables
Diet n Mean SD Min Max % of Zeros Zero Flag
Control 12.0 10.1 3.2 6.3 16.0 0.0
CR25 11.0 11.7 2.8 8.2 17.0 0.0
CRA 10.0 10.6 3.4 6.7 17.3 0.0
CRV 12.0 10.3 2.8 5.0 13.7 0.0
Warning symbols: * = >40% zeros in this group, ! = >20% zeros in entire sample Either flag triggers the use of a binary choice model.

Summary Table

Model Summary
Family: gaussian
Parameter Estimate Std. Error 2.5% CI 97.5% CI Type
Fixed Effects
Intercept 10.471 0.586 9.322 11.624 Fixed Effects
DietCR25 0.623 0.749 −0.831 2.097 Fixed Effects
DietCRA 0.023 0.753 −1.439 1.502 Fixed Effects
DietCRV −0.115 0.736 −1.528 1.322 Fixed Effects

Posterior Check

Convergence

Effect Median [95% HDI] Direction Prob. ROPE %
Diet: Control vs CR25
Diet: Control vs CR25 -0.59 [-2.06, 0.80] 78.65 23.60
Diet: Control vs CRA
Diet: Control vs CRA -0.01 [-1.41, 1.49] 51.35 31.10
Diet: Control vs CRV
Diet: Control vs CRV 0.10 [-1.29, 1.50] 56.60 33.70
Diet: CR25 vs CRA
Diet: CR25 vs CRA 0.59 [-1.10, 2.61] 74.10 21.70
Diet: CR25 vs CRV
Diet: CR25 vs CRV 0.69 [-0.94, 2.61] 77.70 18.15
Diet: CRA vs CRV
Diet: CRA vs CRV 0.12 [-1.80, 1.87] 55.05 25.70

No continuous ROPE effects available.

Bar Plot

Density Plot

Other Maternal Behaviours by Grouping Variables
Diet n Mean SD Min Max % of Zeros Zero Flag
Control 12.0 4.2 2.3 0.7 9.0 0.0
CR25 11.0 2.8 2.3 0.3 7.3 0.0
CRA 10.0 4.0 3.1 1.0 9.7 0.0
CRV 12.0 4.3 1.9 1.7 7.7 0.0
Warning symbols: * = >40% zeros in this group, ! = >20% zeros in entire sample Either flag triggers the use of a binary choice model.

Summary Table

Model Summary
Family: gamma
Parameter Estimate Std. Error 2.5% CI 97.5% CI Type
Fixed Effects
Intercept 1.430 0.175 1.100 1.788 Fixed Effects
DietCR25 −0.370 0.255 −0.867 0.139 Fixed Effects
DietCRA −0.015 0.261 −0.516 0.508 Fixed Effects
DietCRV 0.035 0.249 −0.460 0.527 Fixed Effects

Posterior Check

Convergence

Effect Median [95% HDI] Direction Prob. ROPE %
Diet: Control vs CR25
Diet: Control vs CR25 0.36 [-0.18, 0.81] 93.45 4.55
Diet: Control vs CRA
Diet: Control vs CRA 0.02 [-0.49, 0.52] 52.90 14.70
Diet: Control vs CRV
Diet: Control vs CRV -0.04 [-0.51, 0.48] 56.00 17.25
Diet: CR25 vs CRA
Diet: CR25 vs CRA -0.35 [-0.88, 0.19] 90.20 6.50
Diet: CR25 vs CRV
Diet: CR25 vs CRV -0.40 [-0.90, 0.10] 94.15 4.15
Diet: CRA vs CRV
Diet: CRA vs CRV -0.06 [-0.56, 0.48] 58.75 13.80

No continuous ROPE effects available.

Bar Plot

Density Plot

Eating/Drinking by Grouping Variables
Diet n Mean SD Min Max % of Zeros Zero Flag
Control 12.0 8.1 3.4 4.3 15.0 0.0
CR25 11.0 7.4 2.8 2.4 13.3 0.0
CRA 10.0 7.6 2.8 2.7 12.3 0.0
CRV 12.0 7.4 2.9 3.7 14.0 0.0
Warning symbols: * = >40% zeros in this group, ! = >20% zeros in entire sample Either flag triggers the use of a binary choice model.

Summary Table

Model Summary
Family: gaussian
Parameter Estimate Std. Error 2.5% CI 97.5% CI Type
Fixed Effects
Intercept 7.675 0.578 6.553 8.804 Fixed Effects
DietCR25 −0.204 0.741 −1.651 1.265 Fixed Effects
DietCRA −0.066 0.748 −1.542 1.405 Fixed Effects
DietCRV −0.195 0.725 −1.609 1.216 Fixed Effects

Posterior Check

Convergence

Effect Median [95% HDI] Direction Prob. ROPE %
Diet: Control vs CR25
Diet: Control vs CR25 0.20 [-1.30, 1.57] 60.50 29.65
Diet: Control vs CRA
Diet: Control vs CRA 0.04 [-1.42, 1.56] 52.35 29.50
Diet: Control vs CRV
Diet: Control vs CRV 0.20 [-1.26, 1.59] 61.00 29.50
Diet: CR25 vs CRA
Diet: CR25 vs CRA -0.15 [-2.07, 1.62] 56.05 22.35
Diet: CR25 vs CRV
Diet: CR25 vs CRV 0.02 [-1.89, 1.72] 50.90 23.70
Diet: CRA vs CRV
Diet: CRA vs CRV 0.17 [-1.62, 2.13] 57.30 23.45

No continuous ROPE effects available.

Bar Plot

Density Plot

Self-Grooming by Grouping Variables
Diet n Mean SD Min Max % of Zeros Zero Flag
Control 12.0 7.3 3.0 2.3 10.7 0.0
CR25 11.0 7.2 2.3 3.3 11.3 0.0
CRA 10.0 7.8 2.9 1.7 11.3 0.0
CRV 12.0 6.4 2.8 2.7 10.7 0.0
Warning symbols: * = >40% zeros in this group, ! = >20% zeros in entire sample Either flag triggers the use of a binary choice model.

Summary Table

Model Summary
Family: gaussian
Parameter Estimate Std. Error 2.5% CI 97.5% CI Type
Fixed Effects
Intercept 7.127 0.549 6.062 8.205 Fixed Effects
DietCR25 −0.015 0.712 −1.404 1.383 Fixed Effects
DietCRA 0.317 0.723 −1.112 1.718 Fixed Effects
DietCRV −0.505 0.711 −1.896 0.893 Fixed Effects

Posterior Check

Convergence

Effect Median [95% HDI] Direction Prob. ROPE %
Diet: Control vs CR25
Diet: Control vs CR25 0.00 [-1.42, 1.38] 50.10 27.70
Diet: Control vs CRA
Diet: Control vs CRA -0.34 [-1.76, 1.16] 67.90 25.10
Diet: Control vs CRV
Diet: Control vs CRV 0.53 [-0.94, 1.86] 76.50 22.95
Diet: CR25 vs CRA
Diet: CR25 vs CRA -0.33 [-2.20, 1.53] 64.25 22.60
Diet: CR25 vs CRV
Diet: CR25 vs CRV 0.50 [-1.30, 2.23] 70.70 20.55
Diet: CRA vs CRV
Diet: CRA vs CRV 0.84 [-0.87, 2.67] 81.95 14.15

No continuous ROPE effects available.

Bar Plot

Density Plot

Resting by Grouping Variables
Diet n Mean SD Min Max % of Zeros Zero Flag
Control 12.0 14.7 7.6 3.7 31.7 0.0
CR25 11.0 17.7 10.7 3.0 40.7 0.0
CRA 10.0 16.0 8.9 3.3 29.7 0.0
CRV 12.0 15.2 8.2 0.7 30.3 0.0
Warning symbols: * = >40% zeros in this group, ! = >20% zeros in entire sample Either flag triggers the use of a binary choice model.

Summary Table

Model Summary
Family: gaussian
Parameter Estimate Std. Error 2.5% CI 97.5% CI Type
Fixed Effects
Intercept 15.402 1.362 12.710 18.058 Fixed Effects
DietCR25 0.253 0.946 −1.638 2.090 Fixed Effects
DietCRA 0.024 0.930 −1.814 1.857 Fixed Effects
DietCRV −0.087 0.948 −1.972 1.761 Fixed Effects

Posterior Check

Convergence

Effect Median [95% HDI] Direction Prob. ROPE %
Diet: Control vs CR25
Diet: Control vs CR25 -0.22 [-1.96, 1.71] 60.45 62.35
Diet: Control vs CRA
Diet: Control vs CRA -0.05 [-1.88, 1.79] 51.85 65.25
Diet: Control vs CRV
Diet: Control vs CRV 0.06 [-1.87, 1.78] 52.45 63.80
Diet: CR25 vs CRA
Diet: CR25 vs CRA 0.22 [-2.39, 2.58] 56.20 47.40
Diet: CR25 vs CRV
Diet: CR25 vs CRV 0.30 [-2.24, 3.00] 58.50 47.65
Diet: CRA vs CRV
Diet: CRA vs CRV 0.07 [-2.37, 2.73] 52.40 47.25

No continuous ROPE effects available.

Bar Plot

Density Plot

General Activity - Out of Nest by Grouping Variables
Diet n Mean SD Min Max % of Zeros Zero Flag
Control 12.0 4.1 1.6 1.7 6.7 0.0
CR25 11.0 4.4 1.8 2.3 7.7 0.0
CRA 10.0 4.7 1.3 2.3 6.3 0.0
CRV 12.0 6.4 3.1 3.7 14.7 0.0
Warning symbols: * = >40% zeros in this group, ! = >20% zeros in entire sample Either flag triggers the use of a binary choice model.

Summary Table

Model Summary
Family: gamma
Parameter Estimate Std. Error 2.5% CI 97.5% CI Type
Fixed Effects
Intercept 1.415 0.110 1.206 1.639 Fixed Effects
DietCR25 0.071 0.158 −0.241 0.379 Fixed Effects
DietCRA 0.136 0.161 −0.185 0.451 Fixed Effects
DietCRV 0.449 0.154 0.141 0.749 Fixed Effects

Posterior Check

Convergence

Effect Median [95% HDI] Direction Prob. ROPE %
Diet: Control vs CR25
Diet: Control vs CR25 -0.08 [-0.39, 0.23] 66.95 15.70
Diet: Control vs CRA
Diet: Control vs CRA -0.14 [-0.46, 0.19] 79.25 12.15
Diet: Control vs CRV
Diet: Control vs CRV -0.45 [-0.77, -0.16] 99.60 0.80
Diet: CR25 vs CRA
Diet: CR25 vs CRA -0.06 [-0.39, 0.24] 64.85 17.50
Diet: CR25 vs CRV
Diet: CR25 vs CRV -0.38 [-0.70, -0.03] 98.75 1.60
Diet: CRA vs CRV
Diet: CRA vs CRV -0.31 [-0.63, 0.01] 97.20 2.95

No continuous ROPE effects available.

End of Document