Why You Need to Red Team Your Enterprise AI - Scale AI
Publish date: September 16, 2026
Why You Need to Red Team Your Enterprise AI AI red teaming is deliberate adversarial testing, trying to make an AI system fail so you find and patch the failures before your users do A model can pass every prompt-level test while the system around it fails.
On one enterprise deployment, an automated grader broke it in 3% of 980 attempts, seven in ten of them multi-turn. Human testers working the full system broke it in 68% of their sessions. Ordinary users break the system almost as often as skilled attackers.
In the same engagement, experienced adversarial testers succeeded 73% of the time. Everyday, non-adversarial users still triggered violations 61% of the time. An AI production system has five layers to test: the prompt, the context the system reads, the tools it calls, the agents it coordinates, and the rule set itself.
Why it mattersScale AI reports A model can pass every prompt-level test while the system around it fails.. That matters for enterprise portfolio review because enterprise AI portfolio leader must decide whether Why You Need to Red Team Your Enterprise AI Scale can improve time to value and control coverage without weakening accountability; In the same engagement experienced adversarial testers succeeded 73% of the time. is the boundary for the claim.
AI agent optimization: How context engineering lowers AI costs
Publish date: September 02, 2026
The Economics of Agent Optimization: Context engineering for enterprise AI agents This blog post is the third of a four-part series called The Economics of Agent Optimization , which shares the strategies, capabilities, and proof points to help you optimize agent costs and run AI as a managed investment system on Microsoft Foundry The first post set out the three decisions that systems rest on.
This post takes the next one: making each agent cheaper over time as it learns what works. Every agent has a mechanism that determines what its model sees on each turn. In many production systems, that choice was set during prototyping and never revisited, even though it often drives the largest share of operating cost and contributes to disappointing answers.
This is also the part of an agent that can improve on its own. The model remains as capable as when you selected it, and instructions change only when someone rewrites them. But what an agent knows, can access, and remembers, grows as it runs-making it the key to improving performance while lowering cost over time.
Why it mattersThe evidence combines The first post set out the three decisions that systems rest on. with Every agent has a mechanism that determines what its model sees on each turn.. In enterprise portfolio review, that gives enterprise AI portfolio leader a concrete question about time to value and control coverage, not a reason to assume that This is also the part of an agent that can improve on its own. has been solved.
Salesforce Introduces the Trusted Enterprise AI Harness - Salesforce
Publish date: September 10, 2026
A new architecture that gives AI a shared understanding of the customer and the business - and enables it to act with trust Six trusted capabilities and a new AI Control Plane, built for an open and composable AI ecosystem The Agentic Enterprise is changing how work gets done - and the role every person plays in it As agents become part of how people work across every function of the business, they are taking on more complex work: understanding what is happening, deciding what to do next, taking action across systems, and working alongside people and other agents.
That creates a new enterprise challenge: how do you give agents what they need to do that work reliably, securely, and at scale? That’s the role of an Enterprise AI Harness , and it’s what Salesforce is building: a trusted foundation around AI that brings together what agents need to understand the business, reason and plan, take action, and operate within enterprise controls, without companies having to build and manage those capabilities separately for every agent or AI experience. Salesforce’s Enterprise AI Harness brings together six capabilities spanning context, agency, action, governance, security, and models, delivered through a common, composable architecture and built on the customer relationships, processes, and controls already running the business.
Alongside those capabilities, a new AI Control Plane gives businesses one place to see, manage, and control agents and AI as they spread across the enterprise. Customers can use the six together as one system or take only what they need, with Salesforce technology, their existing technology, or both, including third-party models, agents, and systems. Consider a seemingly simple customer question: “Can we fulfill this order today?” No single system has the complete answer.
Why it mattersThe operational significance is in As agents become part of how people work across every function of the business, they are taking on more complex work: understanding what is happening, deciding what to do next, taking action across systems, and working alongside people and other agents.. It changes the enterprise portfolio review decision for enterprise AI portfolio leader, while Alongside those capabilities a new AI Control Plane gives businesses one place to see manage and control agents keeps the reported result from being treated as universal.
Why enterprise AI projects keep failing
Publish date: August 28, 2026
Over the past three years, as an independent cloud and AI consultant, advisor, and industry influencer, I have worked with numerous companies seeking my expertise I have helped evaluate, optimize, coach, and support their generative AI and agentic AI initiatives.
These engagements were not merely theoretical discussions or vendor-led proofs of concept. They involved real-world enterprise activities, including architecture design, technology selection, deployment planning, governance frameworks, integration, cost analysis, and operational planning. Some organizations sought a second opinion before scaling an AI platform.
Others had pilots that performed well in demos but collapsed when connected to real systems. Some needed help selecting models, cloud services, vector databases , or orchestration tools. Others wanted to understand why their expensive AI investments were generating activity but not measurable value.
Why it mattersInfoWorld connects the development to a practical control question: They involved real-world enterprise activities, including architecture design, technology selection, deployment planning, governance frameworks, integration, cost analysis, and operational planning.. For enterprise AI portfolio leader, the implication is a test of time to value and control coverage under the constraint that Others had pilots that performed well in demos but collapsed when connected to real systems..
McKinsey says enterprise AI is finally 'on the road to ROI'
Publish date: August 25, 2026
Fasten your seatbelt and empty that bladder: AI investment is rising, but reported enterprise earnings impact remains stubbornly flat SAAS Salesforce staggers back to feet after global outage databases Oracle celebrates banner quarter with another round of layoffs ai and ml Ex-FTC boss Khan urges Uncle Sam to break out the handcuffs for AI CEOs, citing 1934 precedent software Fedora 45 beta drags the Linux console into the 21st century security Google Pixel phones pwned in zero-click attacks Four years into the generative AI revolution, consulting giant McKinsey reckons we've finally started the engine and are officially "on the road to ROI." Whether that road leads to actual profit-making and how long it takes to travel is anyone's guess, because the firm's data suggests most respondents still aren't reporting an enterprise-level earnings contribution from AI McKinsey surveyed 1,719 professionals and business leaders from around the world and across industries for its report on the State of AI in 2026, and what it found sounds a lot like what similar studies have determined in the past couple of years.
According to the report, more businesses are deploying more AI in the belief that their investments will start paying off, but the number of people reporting an actual earnings boost from their AI initiatives has remained flat. According to the survey data, 37 percent of respondents “attribute at least some EBIT [earnings before interest and taxes] impact to AI use,” which is “about the same” share as respondents to its 2025 survey. The word "some" is doing a lot of heavy lifting there, because only a small minority of respondents qualify as McKinsey’s AI high performers.
McKinsey considers AI high performers to be respondents who attribute at least 5 percent of their organizations’ EBIT to AI use and describe the technology’s impact as “significant.” The number of high performers has remained flat since last year - just 6 percent of survey respondents met both criteria. Despite the face-slapping reality of hard-to-find benefits, companies are plowing ahead with their AI investments - at least for now. “Organizations’ conviction in AI is growing faster than the immediate financial returns they can attribute to it,” McKinsey said. “More expect AI to reshape their business over the next three years than did a year ago, and they continue to plan to invest more.” Once you sink your tech budget into all that Kool-Aid, it’s hard to put the powder back in the pack, it seems. Agentic AI use is up, says McKinsey, with 40 percent of respondents at organizations with more than $1 billion in annual revenue saying they’re scaling AI agents, compared to 27 percent last year.
Why it mattersThis is more than a category signal because McKinsey considers AI high performers to be respondents who attribute at least 5 percent of their organizations’ EBIT to AI use and describe the technology’s impact as “significant.” The number of high performers has remained flat since last year - just 6 percent of survey respondents met both criteria.. In enterprise portfolio review, enterprise AI portfolio leader can use it to examine time to value and control coverage; the gating issue remains McKinsey considers AI high performers to be respondents who attribute at least 5 percent of their organizations EBIT.
HP Extends Data-Center AI Architecture to the Edge - HP
Publish date: September 09, 2026
Extends Data-Center AI Architecture to the Edge Enabling organizations to deploy and manage open, virtualized AI from the data center to the edge with ZGX Fury and Red Hat AI Factory with NVIDIA News Highlights: is collaborating with Red Hat and NVIDIA to deliver an enterprise AI platform designed to run production inference closer to users, applications, machines and data The planned solution will combine HP ZGX Fury, powered by NVIDIA GB300 Grace B lackwell Ultra Desktop Superchip and Red Hat AI Factory, enabling enhanced AI and orchestration capabilities.
Customers will be able to evaluate the solution in a sandboxed environment on HP devices running Red Hat AI Factory with NVIDIA before moving use cases into production. 8, 2026 - HP Inc. today announced a collaboration with Red Hat, the world’s leading provider of open-source solutions, to give organizations more choice in where AI workloads run, whether locally, in the cloud or across both environments. In collaboration with Red Hat, HP is developing an open, enterprise-grade AI platform to deliver purpose-built AI infrastructure powered by Red Hat AI Factory with NVIDIA.
HP’s open enterprise-grade AI platform aims to help companies maximize local AI inference throughput with up to 20 PFLOPS FP4 AI performance, reduce environment setup time and deployment risk, and improve GPU utilization through optimized CUDA libraries, scheduling, and multi-GPU workload orchestration. Red Hat AI Factory with NVIDIA is an integrated AI platform, built on the industry-leading infrastructure of Red Hat Enterprise Linux and Red Hat OpenShift, for deploying and managing AI models, agents and applications across the hybrid cloud. The collaboration provides the ability to accelerate AI development by reducing setup time, enabling local agentic coding, and allowing companies to offload compute to the ZGX Fury without altering existing workflows.
Why it mattersThe development changes the control question for enterprise AI portfolio leader: HP’s open enterprise-grade AI platform aims to help companies maximize local AI inference throughput with up to 20 PFLOPS FP4 AI performance, reduce environment setup time and deployment risk, and improve GPU utilization through optimized CUDA libraries, scheduling, and multi-GPU workload orchestration.. If the team applies it to enterprise portfolio review, it must reconcile The planned solution will combine HP ZGX Fury powered by NVIDIA GB300 Grace B lackwell Ultra Desktop Superchip and Red Hat AI Factory enabling with HP s open enterprise-grade AI platform aims to help companies maximize local AI inference throughput with up to before claiming movement in time to value and control coverage.