Why You Need to Red Team Your Enterprise AI - Scale AI
Publish date: September 16, 2026
Why You Need to Red Team Your Enterprise AI AI red teaming is deliberate adversarial testing, trying to make an AI system fail so you find and patch the failures before your users do A model can pass every prompt-level test while the system around it fails.
On one enterprise deployment, an automated grader broke it in 3% of 980 attempts, seven in ten of them multi-turn. Human testers working the full system broke it in 68% of their sessions. Ordinary users break the system almost as often as skilled attackers.
In the same engagement, experienced adversarial testers succeeded 73% of the time. Everyday, non-adversarial users still triggered violations 61% of the time. An AI production system has five layers to test: the prompt, the context the system reads, the tools it calls, the agents it coordinates, and the rule set itself.
Why it mattersScale AI reports A model can pass every prompt-level test while the system around it fails.. That matters for enterprise portfolio review because enterprise AI portfolio leader must decide whether Why You Need to Red Team Your Enterprise AI Scale can improve time to value and control coverage without weakening accountability; In the same engagement experienced adversarial testers succeeded 73% of the time. is the boundary for the claim.
Salesforce Introduces the Trusted Enterprise AI Harness - Salesforce
Publish date: September 10, 2026
A new architecture that gives AI a shared understanding of the customer and the business - and enables it to act with trust Six trusted capabilities and a new AI Control Plane, built for an open and composable AI ecosystem The Agentic Enterprise is changing how work gets done - and the role every person plays in it As agents become part of how people work across every function of the business, they are taking on more complex work: understanding what is happening, deciding what to do next, taking action across systems, and working alongside people and other agents.
That creates a new enterprise challenge: how do you give agents what they need to do that work reliably, securely, and at scale? That’s the role of an Enterprise AI Harness , and it’s what Salesforce is building: a trusted foundation around AI that brings together what agents need to understand the business, reason and plan, take action, and operate within enterprise controls, without companies having to build and manage those capabilities separately for every agent or AI experience. Salesforce’s Enterprise AI Harness brings together six capabilities spanning context, agency, action, governance, security, and models, delivered through a common, composable architecture and built on the customer relationships, processes, and controls already running the business.
Alongside those capabilities, a new AI Control Plane gives businesses one place to see, manage, and control agents and AI as they spread across the enterprise. Customers can use the six together as one system or take only what they need, with Salesforce technology, their existing technology, or both, including third-party models, agents, and systems. Consider a seemingly simple customer question: “Can we fulfill this order today?” No single system has the complete answer.
Why it mattersThe evidence combines As agents become part of how people work across every function of the business, they are taking on more complex work: understanding what is happening, deciding what to do next, taking action across systems, and working alongside people and other agents. with That’s the role of an Enterprise AI Harness , and it’s what Salesforce is building: a trusted foundation around AI that brings together what agents need to understand the business, reason and plan, take action, and operate within enterprise controls, without companies having to build and manage those capabilities separately for every agent or AI experience.. In enterprise portfolio review, that gives enterprise AI portfolio leader a concrete question about time to value and control coverage, not a reason to assume that Alongside those capabilities a new AI Control Plane gives businesses one place to see manage and control agents has been solved.
How enterprise AI cost management works - IBM
Publish date: September 11, 2026
Enterprise AI cost management: Close the gap between AI investment and business value Artificial intelligence (AI) investment is outpacing enterprises’ ability to track costs Most enterprises can measure token and cloud costs, but they cannot tie the total cost of ownership (TCO) of AI to business outcomes.
According to Gartner research , 84% of finance leaders say they struggle to measure AI ROI. Closing the gap requires four pillars: Cost attribution, outcome-based metrics, cross-functional governance and continuous portfolio optimization. Apptio® , an IBM company, provides the foundation for all four pillars based on FinOps and IT financial management (ITFM).
AI cost management works by tracking, analyzing and governing the costs of AI workloads across the enterprise. The practice gives finance, IT and business leaders a shared view of AI spending and business outcomes. Spending on AI is forecast to total USD 2.59 trillion globally in 2026, according to Gartner .
Why it mattersThe operational significance is in Most enterprises can measure token and cloud costs, but they cannot tie the total cost of ownership (TCO) of AI to business outcomes.. It changes the enterprise portfolio review decision for enterprise AI portfolio leader, while AI cost management works by tracking analyzing and governing the costs of AI workloads across the enterprise. keeps the reported result from being treated as universal.
Enterprise AI transformation relies on the end-to-end platform: Azure was built for this moment
Publish date: September 03, 2026
Summary The recognition for Microsoft over the past couple of weeks comes down to models, infrastructure, data, applications, and developer tools working as one system when AI moves into production Enterprise AI is moving into production, and our customers are becoming multi-model.
Organizations will use frontier models where capability matters, and smaller, specialized, and open-weight models where economics and finer controls matter. But the value does not come from any model in isolation. It comes from the system around it: infrastructure, data, applications, agents, security, and operations working together.
That compounding value is what Microsoft Azure is built to deliver. Customers want the flexibility to choose across models and infrastructure without having to stitch together and tune every layer themselves. Microsoft has drawn on decades of running mission-critical systems and operating some of the world’s most demanding AI services at global scale.
Why it mattersMicrosoft Azure connects the development to a practical control question: But the value does not come from any model in isolation.. For enterprise AI portfolio leader, the implication is a test of time to value and control coverage under the constraint that That compounding value is what Microsoft Azure is built to deliver..
McKinsey says enterprise AI is finally 'on the road to ROI'
Publish date: August 25, 2026
Fasten your seatbelt and empty that bladder: AI investment is rising, but reported enterprise earnings impact remains stubbornly flat Anthropic decides to support OpenAI's markdown instructions spec Microsoft agentically ports Copilot runtime to Rust for $120K CHANNEL KPMG tech cuts come with a severance sum some staff call insulting on call Techie fixed Wi-Fi dead zone with a drill Researchers find way to listen in on headphones from afar Four years into the generative AI revolution, consulting giant McKinsey reckons we've finally started the engine and are officially "on the road to ROI." Whether that road leads to actual profit-making and how long it takes to travel is anyone's guess, because the firm's data suggests most respondents still aren't reporting an enterprise-level earnings contribution from AI McKinsey surveyed 1,719 professionals and business leaders from around the world and across industries for its report on the State of AI in 2026, and what it found sounds a lot like what similar studies have determined in the past couple of years.
According to the report, more businesses are deploying more AI in the belief that their investments will start paying off, but the number of people reporting an actual earnings boost from their AI initiatives has remained flat. According to the survey data, 37 percent of respondents “attribute at least some EBIT [earnings before interest and taxes] impact to AI use,” which is “about the same” share as respondents to its 2025 survey. The word "some" is doing a lot of heavy lifting there, because only a small minority of respondents qualify as McKinsey’s AI high performers.
McKinsey considers AI high performers to be respondents who attribute at least 5 percent of their organizations’ EBIT to AI use and describe the technology’s impact as “significant.” The number of high performers has remained flat since last year - just 6 percent of survey respondents met both criteria. Despite the face-slapping reality of hard-to-find benefits, companies are plowing ahead with their AI investments - at least for now. “Organizations’ conviction in AI is growing faster than the immediate financial returns they can attribute to it,” McKinsey said. “More expect AI to reshape their business over the next three years than did a year ago, and they continue to plan to invest more.” Once you sink your tech budget into all that Kool-Aid, it’s hard to put the powder back in the pack, it seems. Agentic AI use is up, says McKinsey, with 40 percent of respondents at organizations with more than $1 billion in annual revenue saying they’re scaling AI agents, compared to 27 percent last year.
Why it mattersThis is more than a category signal because McKinsey considers AI high performers to be respondents who attribute at least 5 percent of their organizations’ EBIT to AI use and describe the technology’s impact as “significant.” The number of high performers has remained flat since last year - just 6 percent of survey respondents met both criteria.. In enterprise portfolio review, enterprise AI portfolio leader can use it to examine time to value and control coverage; the gating issue remains McKinsey considers AI high performers to be respondents who attribute at least 5 percent of their organizations EBIT.
AI-ready data: Five gaps preventing enterprise AI from scaling - kpmg.com
Publish date: September 12, 2026
AI-ready data: Five gaps preventing enterprise AI from scaling A CDAO guide to searchability, context, trust, governance, and operating model gaps keeping AI agents, RAG, and autonomous workflows stuck in pilot mode Identify the AI data readiness gaps before the next pilot stalls Enterprise AI stalls when AI systems cannot search across the business, interpret context, and act within governed boundaries This report helps CDAOs diagnose the gaps that keep AI agents, RAG, and autonomous workflows from scaling enterprise wide.
Why enterprise AI needs AI-ready data, not just good data Company leaders are asking AI to do more than summarize information or answer questions. They want agents that can reason through a process, recommend next steps, and accomplish tasks inside the business. But most enterprise data environments were built for people reading dashboards-not AI systems that methodically search, interpret, and act within policy.
Data that works for reporting, analytics, and human reviews may still be unfit for AI agents, RAG, and autonomous workflows. In other words, the data question has changed: The old question: Do we have good data? The new question: Can AI search, reason, and act on our data safely?
Why it mattersThe development changes the control question for enterprise AI portfolio leader: Data that works for reporting, analytics, and human reviews may still be unfit for AI agents, RAG, and autonomous workflows.. If the team applies it to enterprise portfolio review, it must reconcile This report helps CDAOs diagnose the gaps that keep AI agents RAG and autonomous workflows from scaling enterprise wide. with Data that works for reporting analytics and human reviews may still be unfit for AI agents RAG and before claiming movement in time to value and control coverage.